Speeding Ticket With A French Driving License

The Lie of the Week:

Chirac's immunity is equal to the Lodo AlfanoCondividi
Today at 8:53 - Simone Pomi -

After the trial of the former French President Jacques Chirac all the cavalry-Berlusconi media started to repeat the old story used to maturity: The immunity was intended to allow France to the President to work in peace and serenity, the same thing that was made in Italy with the Lodo Alfano, and that the Constitutional Court but has canceled. Chirac is under investigation for false assumptions made when he was mayor Paris (1995/1996). As the Republic Presidiante Alps gained immunity thwart his dispute with the Justice for 12 years, even blocking their prescription. All true, and so similar to Italy and thus unfairly then inserted under the heading "the lie of the week"?



No. This time the situation is different, almost opposite and that is a true fact (the comparison between the French and immunities of the Lodo Alfano) adrift in a sea of \u200b\u200blies (the very different context of the two countries ).



The first point is the public position of the two involved. Chirac was President of the Republic, Berlusconi Chairman of the Board. In France, the immunity is only for the head of state and since the difference between the two republics, very close "their executive power" here are other reasons more compelling and less bureaucratic.
The second are the types of crimes with which both the connection and its role. Chirac is under investigation for alleged "political crimes" arising from his tenure as mayor of the French capital. Certainly not an excuse but very different from the various crimes with which Berlusconi, almost all of which are made by contractor and not related to his role or political life. The third
immediately connected to the second point is the chronology of events. Chirac was joined by these investigations in 1997 when he was in full presidential term. Berlusconi has often been investigated and indicted before he was elected prime minister, as for example in the recent case of Mills.



fourth and final point is the use of their role to get "privileges" and thus short way to save themselves from their own legal problems.
Chirac in his 12 years as president has never dreamed of the law decriminalizing the offense or that only as half the prescription. The Knight and his government but in the last 15 years have done well too many of these abuses:

Law 367/2001. Letters rogatory.

Law 383/2001 (So-called "Tremonti bis").

n.61/2001 Law (corporate law reform).

Law 248/2002 ("Law Cirami on reasonable suspicion")


Decree-Law No. 282/2002 (so called "football-saving decree").

Law 289/2002 (Finance Act 2003).

Law n.140/2003 (so-called "Lodo Schifani).

Decree-Law n.352/2003 (so-called "Decree-save Rete 4).


n.350/2003 Law (Finanziaria 2004). Law 311/2004 (Finanziaria 2005).


Law 112/2004 (so-called "Gasparri Law").


Law n.308/2004. Extension of building amnesty protected areas.


Law 251/2005 (so-called "ex Cirielli).


Legislative Decree 252, 2005 (Consolidated Supplementary Welfare).


Law 46/2006 ("Law Shee").


Law n.124/2008 (so-called "Lodo Alfano").


Decree-Law No. 185/2008.


increase from 10 to 20 percent of its share of action that any company can buy and hold portfolio.

Bill on the "short trial".
(planned)
(source and more explanation)

Here are the facts as truth only to be turned over and used to swallow the citizen with a barrage of lies, incredible. Italy
Awake!

http://2piu2uguale5.ilcannocchiale.it/post/2385047.html

------------------------


POLICY.
The former president: "I do not use appeals to join, but agree to Saviano"
Concerned about the health of our democracy, "Manipulation rules"
Ciampi: "Just read on a personal
Berlusconi delegitimize the institutions" of
MASSIMO GIANNINI Carlo Azeglio Ciampi



"We live a sad time. In the final years of my life, really did not imagine having to watch such a barbarity of political action, an assault so brutal and systematic institutions and values \u200b\u200bin which I believed ...». The first thing that strikes you, in the words of Carlo Azeglio Ciampi, is the bitterness. Deep bitterness of the fate of Italy and the conditions of our democracy. And never

as on this occasion the former head of state, a true "noble father" of the Republic, launches its indictment of those responsible for this "barbarism" and this "aggression": Silvio Berlusconi his government and his majority, who are tearing down to "pick hits" the principles on which stands the Constitution, that "our civil Bible."

"You see - reasons Ciampi - my bitterness comes from the realization of what is happening everyday now on justice, not only on justice. There has been a real deterioration of collective values, you feel a sense of constant manipulation of the rules an inexorable loss of those who are the cardinal points of our civil life. " Applies to all: not only the relations between politics and the judiciary. The relations between the executive and Parliament between the government and the presidency, and organs between premier warranty from the Constitutional Court. The whole institutional system, according to Ciampi, is exposed to a work of gradual "deconstruction". "Here is no longer a question of political battle, which can also be harsh, as is natural in any democracy. Here are the references to destabilize the most solid building democratic institutions that is, humble themselves and the values \u200b\u200bthat the institutions they represent. This is my bitter reflection ...".

Ciampi, perhaps for the first time, speaks bluntly of the Knight, and what has been and is in this "decaying landscape." "I remember a good book Marc Lazar, released a couple of years ago, where I used to come and Berlusconi as recounted details of a pendulum: on the one hand Ciampi, the man who defends the institutions, and across Berlusconi, the man to delegitimize the institutions. Never before today I would say that this picture sums up perfectly what I think. I have lived my whole life in institutions and the institutions that are the heart of democracy. And do not forget the lessons of Vincenzo Cuoco on the Neapolitan Revolution of 1797: the happiness of the people are no longer necessary orders that the men, the institutions beyond the boundaries of generations. But then, to the viability of the institutions, we need men and their civic passions, their ideals of democracy. And I, today, this is what I see lacking in those who govern us ...".

The last chapter of this nefarious "Rewriting" of our formal constitution and obviously concerns the material justice, Alfano, and now the bill on the process by which the short-premier, to clear the two processes that concern him, he scorched earth of the entire judiciary power. On this conviction of Ciampi is without appeal: "The reforms are made by citizens, not for individuals. I always thought, and today I am more convinced than ever: enough with the ad personam" laws, which do not resolve people's problems and do not help the country to improve. " Fa more, the former president. It goes to reflect on what might happen if and when this new law is approved, shame: "I do not give advice to anyone, least of all those who I succeeded the Quirinale. But the head of state, including its powers, has one of the promulgation. If a law is not not signing it. It should not be used as an argument for always so that the promulgation if Parliament rejected the law to re-approve the first time, the president is forced to sign it. Meanwhile promulgation of the law at first reading: The Constitution expressly provides that presidential prerogative. The use: a way to send a strong message to those who want to alter the rules, the Parliament and the public. "Ciampi Napolitano does not name, but it makes an implicit reference to Francesco Saverio Borrelli:" I think for those who care institutions today, the only rule that respects both that of "quantum potes": do what you can. In other words: hold on. "

He himself, in his seven years on the Hill, has resisted several times behind the Knight. From the Gasparri law for the tv to the reform of the judiciary of Castles:" It is true, but I only did the my duty. There is one thing, which I regret to this day: my only message to the Chambers, the pluralism of broadcasting and information. Then it was a crucial issue for the quality of our democracy. The Parliament has not picked it up, and since then has not done anything. Today, just watching TV to realize, that theme is even more serious. A real emergency ".

But so dark, according to Ciampi, there is also some glimmer of light. For example, the call to" Republic "by Roberto Saviano, who asks the prime minister to withdraw the law sull'abbreviazione process, the "rule of privilege." "I - says the president emeritus of the Republic - for the role I played I do not use sign calls. But I agree with from beginning to end to Saviano. Meet one of the principles that have guided me throughout life. And the fact that he got so many acceptances represents hope, especially for young people. It's the old motto of the Rosselli brothers: Do not give up. They paid with their lives for faithfulness to this principle. Here and now, in Italy, there is no game in people's lives. But there are values \u200b\u200bfor which we fought and which we believed. At stake is the good democracy: trust me, it is enough to not give up. "

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @ @ @ @

That grillino Carlo Azeglio
Marco Travaglio
Ahiahiahi, Mrs. Longari, where we will end. Now it also says a former President of the Republic, former governor of the Bank of Italy, a senator for life, Giorgio Napolitano should or could at least stop sign laws shame. a man who speaks some of the bounce, as the Gasparri-1 on TV, sort Castelli judiciary and Sheehan (which abolished the appeal of the prosecutor, but not the accused). But others, such as the Order-saving Rete 4 that allowed Berlusconi to avoid shutting down its TV unfair (provided by the Court of Look of 2002) was signed on Christmas Eve 2003 by a beneficiary, the promulgated. But even for him there is a limit to everything. Even all'indecenza. "I - pushed in the interview with Republic - I do not give advice to anyone, least of all to those who have succeeded at the Quirinale. But then he gives them all right: "The head of state, including its powers, has one of the promulgation. If a law is wrong, not signing. " Article 74 of the Constitution says just that: "The President of the Republic, before promulgating the law, motivated by a message to the Chambers may request a new debate. If the Houses once more pass the bill, it must be promulgated. " Does not specify that to be rejected, must be "manifestly unconstitutional", as it supports the current occupant of the Quirinale. On 23 July 2008, when less than 24 hours Alfano promulgated the law passed by the House and Senate from 25 days to give impunity to the premier, the Hill gave a bizarre statement: "The benchmark for the decision of the Head of State is No decision was 24 of 2004 in which the Constitutional Court declared the constitutional illegitimacy of article. 1 of Law No 140 of 20.06.2003 (the award Schifani, ed) which provided for the suspension of trials which invested the highest offices of state. At first sight, which is for the head of state at this stage, the bill approved June 27 by the Council of Ministers was found to correspond to the observations made in that sentence. " We now know that was not true at all: the Consulta rejected the Alfano just referring to the decision that rejected the Schifani and who said what made her say the Quirinale. Unlike the Hill, where 100 were realized from the beginning of eminent jurists and retired four presidents in an appeal that of Consulta Alfano called the "manifestly unconstitutional", but also comedians such as Grillo, Di Pietro as politicians, newspaper editors as Flores d'Arcais and Padellaro. The latter expressed "deep unease" on the drive, and gotten the rebukes of the Democratic Party, the reformatory, the Fireman's Night and all the trumpets of the "do not pull the jacket to the head of state." Nonsense that are back to ring when the newspaper sent the Quirinale Without the signatures of 80 000 readers in the appeal not to sign the mafia shame the tax shield. Result: The press office of the Quirinale sent us a letter piqued (as you're allowed?). Meanwhile, the head of Been summoned a citizen who dared to ask them to sign it all: "So, if you do not sign a law, I refer the same." Ciampi now known arsonist, invites you to "resist": "You should not use that argument as much, if Parliament refused to re-approve the law, the president is forced to sign it. Meanwhile promulgation of the law at first reading, to send a strong message to those who want to alter the rules, the Parliament and the public. " Also because, if a law is unconstitutional in the second reading, the President may, however, refuse to promulgate it and resign. The Constitution is a bit 'more important than a chair.

Source Of Cydia Pokemon Rom Hacks

to waste tires as a way to burn them ...!?!

MIRACLES OF THE GOVERNMENT AND BERLUSCONI

unending process.

LA BRANDE Beffa.

Messgae In Christing Card

a magistrate who has to die .... and he knows

...............

Leopard Vest Ferris Bueller

BLOG OF THE PRIVATIZATION OF WATER

the privatization of water from the blog of Adria ...

http://adria.blogolandia.it/2009/11/20/sulla-privatizzazione-dell-acqua/


The House finally approved the measure Ronchi implementing a series of EU obligations and where and 'planned privatization of water systems. The votes were 302 compared to 263 against. Members present and voting were 565, the required majority was 283 votes.

Before writing this post I tried to become well-informed on the details of this law on the privatization of 'water and frankly I found it all and its opposite, a total chaos where no one knows whom to believe. To hear
Ronchi not exist in fact the will to privatize the 'water, but to fulfill an existing European legislation and to outsource to private distribution. To hear Vendola instead there would be no European rule that inporrebbe privatization.

Legambiente takes the field for the VC Dezza president who says, "With this law is dispersed and commodify a precious heritage, the common good, whose use must meet the absolute criteria of public benefit."

From what little I could understand the institutional bodies (state, regions and municipalities) can decide whether to outsource to private or directly manage. But I think the problems are others.

First we start from 'beginning, in Italy know for sure that 50% of' water is lost because of crumbling pipes that would have the task of bringing up the taps at home, we know that a good part of the 'water is consumed in irrigation and consequently lost.

Against a safe higher costs in the bill if it is managed by individuals who can think with a better service and a program that takes into account periodic maintenance to the network can recover what is lost daily to public management?

entrusted to private management in Italy does not seem to excel quality, in every field. In my opinion this is the point of view from which to begin, let's not forget that there are areas in the peninsula in which privatization should be to fatten the already full belly of mafia organizations. Not to mention the intrusion of political and of the 'other side.

However, finally, facilities management and distribution to private individuals with the 'obligation to excellent maintenance and management of natural resources by the public. The 'water should remain a common good.




We have a ruling class of GMOs and risk becoming a nation of zombies Oliviero Beha (behablog.it)

There is something that goes beyond the bill on the reform process, the short limitation, the Premier of the obvious attempt to save the session ghirba at risk after the rejection of unconstitutional Lodo Alfano.

Something that goes beyond the derby between those opposed to words or political events (here it is already harder, it seems, is a country with strong oral to written words but weak when it comes to risk and benefits ... privileges), Mr Berlusconi and the Italians who vote for or support it "even" in these circumstances so slippery. Slip in the first constitutional if that item is still 3 on "The Law is equal for all" that stands in the courtroom (an idea: if it took the word and how it was done to the crucifix ?...).
I mean that I am not here to menarla still on Berlusconi.

I am interested in the state instead of the country.
Make me an exercise in abstraction: if the specific interest of the Prime Minister, his ball for fifteen years and more, since before entering politics, that is, avoid being prosecuted for a series of events because " robes are red "(if you condemn him, if acquitted or prescribed, are blue), the social and economic climate in EXAMINED to-know-who just three years ago, everything would be different.

Do you remember the country three years ago?

you remember that there was no talk of crisis, the subprime mortgage bubble and finance made up of paper (of course then connected with a different timing of the crisis in the real economy) did not result in spite someone had feared for some time (Sylos Labini, among the Italians, but many other economists around the world)?
that the bag was strong, the ball still in the labor market, yet the idea of \u200b\u200bfuture expansion and so on? So this

over Berlusconi and Prodi, to be clear, this in the heart of everyday Italian with all the problems today in a nutshell that have developed?

The "bubble Italy" probably allowed to talk about the processes to Berlusconi, the opposition political party of speculation "as if it were all true, that we were really in front of the main problem of the country.

But today?

Look around, ask a young graduate with honors if not hard to do odd jobs from a few hundred euro a month because no one answers even sending his resume.

Ask many who do not have credit from banks (while the usual suspects continue to be sprayed by money with an ease that puts fear without being "viable", cf. the case Zunino sanitation for all) and are reduced to "strangle" usury.
Ask a generation of workers without pay "on the roof," really "an Italy on the Roof" to protest while the "caste" he insisted quietly without paying duty.

Ask anyone who deals with the factories and companies while employers too often they move on the chessboard capital making them "invisible" (the episode of the attempted eviction of workers dell'Eutelia with private security guards posing as forces of ' order is not a film script but the epigraph of a desperation and a total distortion).

Ask Italians with less work and less money because the process of integration with immigrants is made more difficult and more turbid than the climate, the reason most distant, feeling less "feel" and less strict.

I could continue, but our lives every day that you should know well, although usually the media or not to tell the story or argument, to actually use this as ammunition against anyone (see my essay " The new monsters "), or against Berlusconi against De Benedetti and so on (but the first government).

For this sketch of "fresco Italy" I do stride here, squeaks, broke in contradiction with the "problem of justice Premier".

It is, paradoxically, a luxury we can no longer afford, even beyond the goodness / badness of the ruling on the merits.

But they want to understand.

do not understand.

E 'a ruling class of GMOs, genetically modified organisms now.

We risk becoming a nation of zombies. November 13, 2009




here are my links:

http://mandiamolovia.blogspot.com/


http://cominciandodacapo.blogspot.com/

MY NOTES ON FACEBOOK:
------------------------ ------
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?v=app_2347471856&ref=profile&id=1600661190

------

------------- ------------ ------
http://lepaginelp.blogspot.com/
-
http://glorienapoletane.blogspot.com/
-------------

http://bloggerribelle.blogspot.com/

http://ittehcciparual.blogspot.com/

-----------------------------------
http://perlapalestina.blogspot.com/2009/03/roberto-di-nunzio-palestina-report.html
--------------------------------------
http://vocemigrante.blogspot.com/
-------------------
http://bloggerribelle.blogspot.com/
------
http://intercciperversi.blogspot.com/
----------
http://tuttedonne.blogspot.com/
-------
http://lallapicche.blogspot.com/2009/06/leditoriale-di-lalla.html
----------
http://israelesorpresa.blogspot.com/
------
http://solelp.blogspot.com/2001/08/un-uomo-che-sussura-ai-tiburones.html
------- -------
http://sacchettianapoli.blogspot.com/

http://alcunepersone.blogspot.com/2007/10/un-emigrato-in- new-zeeland.html

http://alcunepersone.blogspot.com/
-------- --------- ----






---------------------------

Paint One Wall Red Colour

@@@@@@@@@@@@@ @@@@@@@@@@


Luca Rinaldi WRITES:

Dear Laura, I can tell you about the European directive on water privatization, Ronchi probably refers to the notorious "Bolkestein directive", under which, if the Italian deputies do their job, they would be aware and beat in the face of all the majority, because no one in that directive force anyone to privatize the water: the story Community obligation is sand in the eye. Let me return to a post on my blog for more information about the numbers of the deal 'WATER'.
------------------

After the first step, the Ronchi Decree (a hornet's nest of rules in one law all thrown from motorway concessions, competitiveness of food products to the privatization of water), cash in trust and will become law. The water will go to private management. Why were those decisions and how this time the chiefs have mocked the people?

There are at least three reasons that show how the rule is, first and second of place, unless in the interests of all citizens. The rule concerning the privatization of water has been incorporated within this Ordinance Community obligations, but in reality there is no European standard requiring Italy to privatize water, not even the Bolkestein directive (see page 50) on privatization and liberalization, as a rule, just Article 1 those areas that are of public interest. The decree provides that presented a series of local public services, such as water, are passed on to the market, then regarded as goods of economic importance and rights of citizens.

Even today the presence of individuals in the water sector is strong, but the municipalities can participate in the management by joint-stock companies wholly public, but within two years, with the new rules, this can no longer be necessary to entrust the management and fully to private enterprises or joint stock company, in which private shareholders holding at least 40% of the capital. If the public provides access to the resource for all, at least in the case of water, not for individuals that make the logic of profit their forte.

Over the past seven years have seen a surge in water charges by 47%, according to estimates by ISTAT, soaring higher in those municipalities where water privatization has already started. It is said that privatization would lead individuals to invest in the renewal of the water system, sewerage and sewage treatment, losing 1 / 3 's water during transport. To do this requires an investment by 60miliardi euro. We are confident that this privatization will automatically see the investment in renewing the water supply?

No, because the same Italian experience shows that where the management water is private problems out there, so much so that in countries where this happens, people should cook with bottled water, or lie at seven in the morning with the bath water that flows from the taps, with bills to dizziness, as the inhabitants of Ceccano, province of Frosinone. Exactly bills dizziness and poor water quality, despite the private management face dominates the beginning of 2008. 1500 complaints about 7000 inhabitants, just to cite one example still in small scale.

Consumer associations denounced the possibility to raise rates as much as 30%, which would see increases in a single decade (2000-2010) more than half the cost of a primary good and the right citizen. Moreover, the business at stake is about 6miliardi euro, as an opportunity to think about leaving so greedy?

If Italy approves privatization, there is to say that a) you arrive very late b) wherever it was tested the idea was abandoned. Examples? In Paris, after 25 years the water has returned to public, even in Montpellier and other common French, just to reiterate that the model in the private sector has not to be done for the Alps. Germany has blocked the privatization, while in Belgium the chapter is almost closed for some time, while in Sweden, after a suggestion so do not talk about it anymore. In the Netherlands, even in September 2004 the parliament decided, by law, to prevent any form of water privatization. The only areas of privatization remain Britain and some Eastern European countries.

Why all these have backtracked on privatization? Perhaps the answer is to be found in the costs: it costs more to keep it that privatizing public. So why privatize? We are in Italy baby, and the lobby ready to bleed the citizens are always alert, to do something to convince the good of the country, continue to do something for their pockets.




Read more:

Luca Rinaldi


http://lucarinaldi.blogspot.com


November 21, 2009 17:38

@@@@@@@@@@
Saturday, November 21, 2009 COMMON GOOD WATER



PUBLISH THE LETTER OF ALEX Zanotelli alone explains all the blindness of those who still struggling to understand the value of water and made it a mere political exercise!


Naples, November 19, 2009
privatized water

"Damn you ...."
I can not use another expression for those who voted for the privatization of water, which was used by Jesus in the Gospel of Luke, against of the rich: "Woe to you who are rich. ..." Damn
those who voted for the commodification of water.
We will continue to shout that water is life, water is sacred, water is a basic human right.
It 's the most crushing defeat of the policy. E 'stravittoria of the economic-financial potentates, the international lobby. And 'the victory of the policy of privatization, business, business.
is at the expense sis 'water', today the most precious asset of humanity, which will be increasingly scarce, both for climate change, and an increase in population. That the privatization of water is a choice that will paid a high price from the underprivileged classes of that country (bills by 30-40% more, at least), but mainly from the impoverished of the world. If today 50 million a year die from starvation and related diseases, 100 million will die of thirst tomorrow. Which of the three billion people living today with less than two dollars a day, will pay for water? "We are
for life, water is life, source of life. And we are sure that theirs is only a Pyrrhic victory. For this reason we ask everyone to turn this 'defeat' in a renewed commitment to water, for life, for democracy. We are confident that this parliamentary vote will be a "boomerang" for those who have voted.
Our first is an appeal to the people, to every man and woman of good will. We have to start from below, from ordinary people, by the municipalities.
Thus, we ask:

-CITIZENS of protest against the Ronchi Decree, by sending e-mail to their parliamentary
-creating groups in defense of water as locally at the regional level;
-form themselves into cooperatives to manage their water.
municipalities to hold councils
-single issue in defense of water;
-state water common good, 'no economic significance';
-SPECIAL PUBLIC COMPANY make the right choice.
THE NEW LAW DOES NOT PREVENT THE TOWNS CHOOSE THE PATH OF THE TOTAL PUBLIC COMPANY SPECIAL MUNICIPAL the so-called.

TO ATO-ATO to 64 (optimal territorial areas), now assigned to Spa in total public capital to transform itself into special agencies, managed with the participation of citizens.
REGIONS
-challenging the constitutionality of the new law as did the Puglia Region;
-pass laws on regional governance of water.

-unions to decide on the privatization of water;
-mobilize and mobilize citizens against the commodification of water.
ITALIAN BISHOPS of
-proclaim water a basic human right in the wake of the recent encyclical of Benedict XVI, which speaks of 'access to water as a universal right of all human beings, without distinction or discrimination "(27);
-protest as CEI (Italian Episcopal Conference) against the decree Ronchi.
COMMUNITY TO 'CHRISTIAN-
to inform their faithful on the water issue;
- organize in defense of water.
parties to
- to express very clearly their position on the management of 'water-
to propose a parliamentary debate on the law of popular initiative against the privatization of water, signed by over 400,000 citizens. Water is
blue gold of the twenty-first century. Together with the air, water is the most precious asset of humanity. We want to cry now more than ever what we yelled in many squares and theaters in this country: "The air and water are absolutely essential to the basic goods and the lives of all living beings from birth and become the natural rights untouchables-are words of Archbishop Emeritus of Messina, G. Mattock. The water belongs to everyone and no one can be allowed to appropriate it to derive illicit profit, and therefore requests that continue to be run exclusively by the municipalities organized into public companies, which have always been the duty of ensuring the distribution at the lowest cost possible. "


Alex Zanotelli
Posted by Gianni Conti to 1.57
Labels: Water essential good of humanity







@@@@@@@ @ @ @ @

GOD AND THE 'DEAD

Good Ideas For Male Basterbation

HOUSEWIFE protesters who began badly ......................

A TRUE STORY:

BERLUSCONI AND



plagiarism.



--------- --------- ---------




attempts to Silenced HISTORY

or

The Knight and the book copied to the historic


So my husband Firpo unmasking

TURIN - A summer 's day in mid-80's Luigi Firpo was standing in an armchair in his villa on the hill Turin with his wife Laura. It was zapping on TV. On Channel 5 a lovely young lady was interviewing the owner, Silvio Berlusconi. And I extolled the 'enormous cultural baggage: "She is also a great scholar of the classics ~'. The Knight screen: "No, do not say that ~ '. She said, "Yes, however, do not be modest. Her doctor, has just published an 'edition of the prestigious' Thomas More's Utopia, with a beautiful preface and a perfect translation from the Latin ~ '. He said, "Well, actually we do not know all the Latin, we must translate it ~ '. Firpo, Turin great intellectual, polemicist of the Press with his "bad thoughts", but also a university professor of the History of Political Thought and among the leading experts in Renaissance culture, he directed antennas. Also because he had recently translated and commented on a 'edition of' Utopia 'for the publisher guide of Naples. L 'attacked interviewer to read the preface of the Knight. After the first two sentences of the 'old student jumped on the couch, "But the preface is mine! It 's all copied! But who is this man? But how dare you? ". 'S episode was reminded Laura Salvetti Firpo's widow, a few days ago, when Silvio Berlusconi in one of his tele-external constituencies is well described in the third person: "The prime minister has been feeding the good reads curriculum and has a very considerable ...». E 'race in the archive, pulled out a folder titled "Berlusconi" has dug a strange note of the Knight autograph and decided to tell the backstory.

"It was just after the summer holidays, I believe in September. Firpo (she calls him so respectfully, ed), on TV when he discovered that Berlusconi had copied his version of 'Utopia, he immediately attacked the phone for that book. They answered that it was a 'private edition, in small numbers, reserved for the' Knight's entourage. But he, by the 'Association of the Friends of Thomas More Milan, managed to get a copy for viewing. The flipped and snapped: "This is not plagiarism, it's worse! What has copied entire passages of my preface my complete translation from Latin, putting his signature. It has changed even the commas." He took a pen and paper and wrote to Berlusconi told to withdraw all copies and immediately announced that he filed a complaint.

few days later the phone rang at home: it was Berlusconi. " At this point an irresistible ballet phone, with the knight who seeks childish excuses to appease the 'angry' s austere professor, and that these, the fury subsided, he enjoys playing cat and mouse. Firpo threatens to throw into everything and drag it to court. "Berlusconi - remember the wife - now blamed a staffer, which he said would have copied the preface and translation without his knowledge. And Firpo pleaded for postponement, while stating that it could not withdraw the thousands of copies already printed and given away to friends and associates. Firpo, understood the character, he began to have fun behind it. He held the rope with the lawsuit. And Berlusconi continued to call every other day with a fifa black. He prayed to spare, whined that the scandal 'would ruined. " Pure Franzo Grande Stevens, prominent lawyer and advisor to Agnelli, who was a friend of Firpo also because of the common application in the PRI, he followed the matter closely, "Firpo told me that plagiarism. He was dumbstruck. Berlusconi also because, instead of apologizing, she blamed a secretary. Then he tried to calm him with expensive gifts, which the professor indignantly mailed to the sender. " "Come over - remember his wife Laura - whole half 'hours on the phone with Knight. And in the end ran to tell, among the 'shocked and amused knew how many know that Berlusconi's jokes. It 'a dealer in carpets, a poker face is incredible, like being in a tele-shopping. " The haggling dragged on for months. Even with an exchange of letters, still reserved (will be public only in 2009, twenty 'years after the death of the scholar). For now, there 's just that note left in the drawers of Mrs Laura, as was also addressed to her, "accompanied by a double gift for Christmas, I think, 1986. Meanwhile, Berlusconi issued a 'revised edition of' Utopia, without the preface and copied with the translation of Firpo regularly cited. But Firpo continued to do the 'offended, he repeated that the matter was serious and was still discussing with lawyers. One day I was invited to Channel 5 to talk about the Pope and Berlusconi found himself behind the scenes who handed him an envelope with money "for his trouble el 'honor us." Of course he refused. Then Christmas came a courier from Segrate with a bouquet of orchids, which was not even the door and a parcel in c 'case was a twenty-four' hours in the crocodile with the LF figures in gold. " The ticket 'accompaniment is in the name Silvio Berlusconi, dated "Christmas 1986" (but the' last digit is a scrawl) and written in ink: "Many good wishes and see you soon I hope ~! Silvio Berlusconi." Then a sentence added in biro: "For God's sake do not spoil me !!!".

But Firpo continued his game: "Send the bag Berlusconi, with a wry note:" Dear Doctor, thank you of his generosity, but luxury items I do not belong in: I am an old professor used to run with a torn bag in which I am very fond. As for flowers, I beg you on behalf of my wife, Laura, do not send more for us, cut flowers are sexual organs cut ~ "I heard him again." - Marco Travaglio


Republic - March 23, 2006 page 11 Section: POLITICS INSIDE


http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2006/03/23/il-cavaliere-il-libro-copiato-allo-storico.html



------------------
Twenty years after the death of Luigi Firpo


Elijah Fiorenza


Next March 2 marks the twentieth anniversary of the death of Luigi Firpo (Turin, 1915-1989), one of the greatest historians of political thought and the greatest Italian scholar of the last century by Tommaso Campanella (Stilo, 1568 - Paris, 1639), to which he devoted his whole life and fifty years of his studies.

This recurrence can not be ignored in Calabria and the city of style, which for a long time, until his death, occupied an important place in my heart, in the life and science of "professor", as it was called, with respect and affection by her "fellow" (The historian, in 1968, was awarded the honorary citizenship of style, while in 2000, the presence of Mr. Agazio the Loiero, current governor of Calabria, at that time Minister of the Republic, and the widow Laura Salvetti, had was named a street and a square).




For Claudio Stillitano hope so is the writer, a scholar of the Dominican monk (his recent book, which bears the title The Secret of Campanella and was published by Graphic Arts Editions Ardore Marina, can be considered the first "stage" of a research sull'esoterismo Campanella), over the coming days will propose to the City of initiatives Stilo cultural tendency to commemorate, in the best way, the distinguished scholar. Stillitano had excellent relations of friendship with Luigi Firpo, Stiles knew that the journalist in 1968 on the occasion of the events promoted for the fourth centenary of the birth of the philosopher and that he saw in 1986, three years before his death: in this last chance the lecturer had confided to him with great enthusiasm, to have found the important manuscripts on Campanella, that would be used for "the book of life ', a publication on the childhood of" son of the shoemaker, "he was working for a long time .

says Claudio Stillitano, quoting Professor. Enzo Baldini: "Luigi Firpo, as well as having had a striking resemblance to the bell of the portrait painted by the painter Francesco Cozza, had the vitality, personality, charisma, prodigious memory, ingenuity and tenacity of the Dominican. Indeed, we can safely say that in Campanella barefoot and poor, who secretly listened to his teacher's lessons Agazio Solea, then to suggest answers to most kids are lucky, the distinguished scholar could see his hard childhood, as well as the philosopher nell'ostinazione , who had written and rewritten treated, essays and poems in often inhumane conditions, Firpo saw the exhausting nights spent in his library, but also the time and manner of their work, which led him to write with ease in the conditions and in different places and inconvenient. "

Luigi Firpo was Professor of the History of Political Thought at the University of Turin, but also played the work as a journalist and popular writer, was also a deputy, who was elected the Republican Party. He carried it with great commitment to intellectual rigor and moral, even coming to national prominence for his battles against the squandering of public money and the inadequate attention by the state, to cultural institutions (universities, museums, public archives and private , foundations, libraries), sectors in which, according Firpo, it was necessary identify the rebirth of Italy. Claudio Stillitano still recalls: "I had heard by telephone in the days after his" tirade "against Rome (which he characterized as" a shapeless agglomerate, violent, pleasure-seeking, reckless and ungovernable '") and Article Alberto Ronchey, published on 15 December 1988 on the front page of La Repubblica. He would not return to the topic. He said however that the Italian Parliament was in urgent need of many "Campanella," which replaces "self-love with the common good."

replied that the Chamber could already count on him, a real bell. "No, Stillitano - she said, almost offended - I'm not Campanella, maybe I was. Our fellow citizens is a goal, an ideal, a port of salvation. If one thinks of having "achieved," he stopped trying, to dream, to rethink his life, to recognize his mistakes. " He concluded with a phrase of the philosopher: - "We are in the world like worms in the human stomach, they do not know the rational soul which man governs, but we think it is senseless mass' -. It was a lesson of exemplary life, the last I heard it three months after he died. " Firpo became interested in "full time" of the Dominican friar after his thesis, whose title is Tommaso Campanella the unity of its political thought, philosophical and religious.

In fifty years of studies and has published over 100 research papers in prestigious journals and periodicals, such as the "Italian newspaper critical of the philosophy," the "Historical Journal of Italian Literature" and "The Festival of Italy" and others. Among his many works on Campanella we can not forget Searches campanelliane, G. Bruno and T. Campanella, selected writings, he appears in the critical edition of The City Sun, unpublished Booklet, All the works, The iconography of Tommaso Campanella, Campanella's Apologia, The punishment of Tommaso Campanella, in which, for the first time, the text appears critical of the Declaration of Castelvetere (current Caulonia), the First and the approach which emerged defensionum Secunda, The Information on reading processes and the narration of the story which was supported above the tale of the rebellion. Works and the research and scientific Firpo deals since 1989, the foundation of the same name, which also bestows scholarships to young researchers, organizes seminars and conferences and has a rich library, a legacy of the scholar, which houses 33 000 volumes, of which six thousand belonging to a priceless ancient collection.

Jblasa.com

Sorority Recommendation Letter Sample

Papell and negotiations

La7 stops the service on the negotiations, the response remains Silvia


Paolo Butturini * - November 20, 2009
La7, the Charter of Duties of the journalist is clear
A specter is haunting the newsroom: the autonomy of journalists ...





... exercising the right / duty to inform the public. What happens to
La7, as has often happened in recent months, becomes a paradigm of a situation.
facts. Monday, November 16, just hours before the scheduled broadcast, the director of Tg La7, Antonello heartburn, remove from the weekly lineup Reality remains the investigation of Silvia, called the deal. The service of connecting reconstructed, beginning with the very well known Papello, the matter of negotiation between state and mafia in the early nineties. The internal review rightly arises not because the director can not exercise its right of control (if you ever wonder why it has not done before, since the service was ready by Sunday night?), But because the time and ways to remove the service Piroso concern for the relationship between autonomy of the journalist, editorial and editorial power.
Basically, the controller Tg La7 argues that "The service was not sent because incomplete and aimed at a reconstruction of part of a story so complex that even different sectors of the state shall provide reading divergent. Marrying a thesis (by the way: that the prosecution) is part of journalism that "militant" who LA7, with the current direction (sic Ed), has never been permitted. And until this Directorate will carry out its mandate, never will be. " In the words of
Piroso echoes a worn theorem huge comeback: Whose turn is it certain subjects (see, in this case, the story Dell'Utri) is necessarily biased, there sounds a bit 'like the "red robes"? . But it is the justification for censoring the investigation that is particularly dangerous because it seeks to clothe itself in objectivity. First of all it should be noted that Marcello Dell'Utri innocent until the last grade of trial, however, has already been sentenced to nine years in the first instance for "collusion with the Mafia." You had to ask him? For the distorted sense of impartiality of heartburn, would like to talk about a clean record, in the first degree is guilty of any offense, we were force to hear the opinion of the accused.
This is not autonomy. The Charter of Duties of the journalist (approved by both the authorizing union) states: "The journalist must respect, nurture and protect the right to information of all citizens and for this research and disseminates any notice or information as it considers the public interest, in respect of truth and with the greatest possible care. The journalist research and disseminates information of public interest despite the obstacles that can be placed in the way of his work and makes every effort to guarantee citizens the knowledge and control of public documents. The responsibility of journalists to citizens will prevail against any other. A journalist can never subordinate to the interests of others and particularly those of the publisher, government or other bodies of the State. " The directors are required to enforce this code of ethics. And then there were certainly Piroso the tools to correct any "critical" as defined them, Service Silvia Resta. Or maybe the information contained in the investigation were false? It does not appear and in fact it was not disputed.
In the delicate balance between duty to inform, respecting privacy and protecting the autonomy of the profession, we are seeing a growing effort to limit the role of the journalist. On the one hand the weakness of the publishing industry (including broadcasting), other legislative initiatives such as the wiretapping bill Alfano. All this adds, now, the perverse role played by some directors that, far from guaranteeing the editorial staff and their freedom, they lend themselves to conceal the news or even worse to criticize when paged. On this, I think, we should measure the true will of the Journalists' return to be the guardian of ethics and credibility of information. Beginning with the defense of my colleague Silvia Resta and of all journalists La7.

* Secretary of the Press Association Romana

From: articolo21.org


La7 stops the service on the negotiations, the response remains Silvia

"It was not my intention to go in this correspondence, but have since been forced to my name brought up several times (and not just as "author" of the service is not aired), and finished even in the newspapers. I do not question the right of the director to act services of the head, and also to block them, if you like. But ... And not by the merits of the service "negotiation", which I worked about three weeks, agreeing content and interviews with my editor Paola Diver: let's say that I can not write, let's say that is a bad journalist, let's say that on I produced about six thousand services for this station, so I can be successful evil. And maybe all the others. Ok, yes. But the director, who had need, in an e-mail to CDR and sent to all, I mean everyone, editors and executives, to appoint, to write "I guess you have given wide coverage to the event took place at the instigation Silvia Stay "? So Silvia Resta, La7 journalist whose investigation into the relationship between mafia and state was removed write to the Director of heartburn. "Insinuation that I reject, perhaps tending to doubt my" loyalty "to the issuer, whose fates are yet I care deeply about any" momentum "and 'party to me, however, that Monday I was short. I do not understand because it 'as if that were not enough, in the email in question, continues to relentlessly attacking me with phrases allusive and cryptic (what it's like the reference to the G8 in 2001? what are the final disciplinary action? maybe you're threatening me? and why ', pray? and what it means to the line where you write "... whether the suspect is named Silvia Stay"?)
Caro director, you talk about normal journalistic dialectic: I'd like to find her. Dialectic of journalism would like that there was a continuous and constructive dialogue. Dialectic of journalism would (allow me to say) that your door was open every so often. which is not '. Dialectic news director would have wanted you, or your Gulotta and Debbi in turn, had spoken at least once with me (at least) of the contents of this service, per se 'delicate and difficult, and not something that' happened. Never happened. Dialectic of journalism (and curiosity 'for the product) would have liked some of the deputies dedicated to the program (or yourself) can come and visit, while I was closed for four days in a room assembly Papell and dealing with sponsors, which is not 'happened. It 's never happened. So 'as not' done the final inspection of the product (working outdoors, mount finished, before the mixing of the service, always passes control to the assistant director. This time no. Why?). That is not being checked viewers have paid (maybe ten, maybe a thousand), that night, even after seeing the promo, expecting a report on the negotiations and have found a replica on landslides, but this failed to control, because 'now I have to pay me?
Your e-mail seems a statement of the police, as if I had been found stealing from the chest. Now, I do not think I deserve this treatment. I did a ' investigation difficult, in solitude, I worked on topics "Pallos and complicated, I still thought it was" our duty "to inform on an issue critical enough for public life: the deal between the state and mafia. Provide some points of view. certainly not all. raise questions. maybe I made some inattention, or some serious mistake accuse me of having heard voices from a single party ", but what part, since the mafia and the mafia?
It could still take as long as someone had asked me in a timely manner. In due time. You could also cut the offending part of Dell 'Utri and maintain the service (33 minutes) which contained the unpublished testimonies of Nicola Mancino and Vincenzo Scotti. You and 'preferred to throw more.
Of course I do not have a private interest, I do not take money from 'anti-mafia, it' by Salvatore Borsellino, killed the brother of the judge who has granted us this exclusive interview believing in our station, it 'from the prosecutor Antonio Ingroia, you say be "Part" (which part?) does not take money from Spatuzza regretted that (not just hearsay ") talks, starting dal'94, contacts between the boss and the nascent organization Forza Italy. Saying explicitly that they were "to be taken lightly, and examined by the prosecution," it seemed useful to know the contents of these statements that have reopened in recent days investigating the massacres and who are also appeared in all the papers.
I did wrong, but do not you dare say that it is "militant journalism." I remind you, however, that in addition to the many codes that govern the ethics of our profession, there 'nor' one for all: the twenty-first article of the Constitution

From: articolo21.org



La7: the protest of 'Order of Journalists and the Press and Lazio Roman
"Sconcerto" and a''peremptory invitation to reconsider,''was the reaction of the President of the Journalists of Lazio, Bruno Tucci, and secretary of the Press Roman Paolo Butturini, the cancellation on Monday 'evening, the service negotiation, inquiry dell'Utri conducted by the journalist Silvia Resta, under the Reality of TgLa7. ''Those who do not understand, without prejudice to the rights of the Director Antonello Piroso - is explained in a statement to Press Association Romana - Article 6 of the Cnlg are the mode 'of the decision, taken just hours before the broadcast of service, for reasons which affect the image and professionalism 'of a colleague who for years has been involved in judicial reporting and e' universally rated as a great balance of professional and experienced. What says Cdr, it 'the curator Paola Palombaro, it' Pina Debbi, deputy editor of the weekly 'Reality', they 'have the same Piroso outside the critical colleague' for which it was thought advisable not to air the investigation. In a time when freedom 'of information - the statement concludes - and' surrounded and put at risk by political, legislative and self-censorship, not 'acceptable for a director to head exposes itself to the question of wanting to censor a report about a subject as' important for democratic coexistence as the relationship between the state and the Mafia. We invite the Director Antonello heartburn, in its autonomy, to reconsider its decision and, once overcome the criticisms' he acknowledged, to broadcast its investigation into the first transmission reach.'' Giuseppe Giulietti, a spokesman for Articolo21 instead expressed solidarity 'to Cdr La7 and Silvia Resta, adding: If and when''Fnsi print and Roman decide to promote a 'initiative not only participate but we will provide the legal Articolo21 for any action they decide to hire and promote.''

From: articolo21.org


Without serious what happened last Monday in La7

Editorial
E 'a serious photographer, unfortunately the climate that you breathe in too many newsrooms today-what happened last Monday in La7.
Block the transmission of the investigation into the alleged deal between the Mafia and was within hours of airing the same night and even after it announced the news of 12.30, represents a clear act of censorship by the Director Antonello heartburn.
Just as it is unacceptable and threatening tone of intimidation against journalist, author of investigation used by Piroso in its response to the legitimate request of the editorial board of La7, to clarify the reasons for the stop of the news report.
are serious matters more frequent issuer of public and private that involve directly the role of the national union of journalists and the professional but that concern all citizens who care about the protection of democratic principles enshrined in the Constitution to begin Article 21 on Freedom of the press ...


the team of ANTIMAFIADuemila expresses solidarity and support to my colleague Silvia Resta and the Cdr La7 after the cancellation of the episode on "The Negotiation.''A new gag information to hide the truth of the facts.


Related stories:

- TV: La7, no investigated on Dell'Utri, and Asr Odg protest



----------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------