by: "Seduction" by Jean Baudrillard, ed.Biblioteca Hats
The female is not only seduction, the challenge is also to be male sex, to assume a monopoly on sex and enjoyment, challenge to bring to the end and to exercise its hegemony morirne.Non unable to accept the fallocrazia now falls just below the tumbling thrust of this challenge, which continued to haunt her constantly throughout the history of our sexual culture. It 'may collapse at the same time also our whole approach to sexuality, costruitasi around the phallic function and the positive definition of sex. Any form positive fits well with the shape and living corresponding negative, but did not escape the challenge of the deadly form reversible. Each structure adapts and absorbs the inversion or subversion, but not the reversal of its terms. This form of seduction that is reversible.
(...) That 's what transpires in the game of seduction more mundane: I flinch, I'll enjoy, it's me that I will play and you subtract from your enjoyment. Mobile game, which is false to assume that sex is just strategy. Strategy shift, rather (if -ducere: take apart, to deviate from its path), confusion, misleading of the truth of sex: do not play and enjoy. There is in this kind of sovereignty of seduction, which is a passion and a game of the order of the sign, and long she is going to win, because it's a reversible and permanent order.
The prestige of seduction is more than the enjoyment of Christian consolation. They want us to believe that it is a natural end, and many go mad because they can not reach it. But love has nothing in common with a drive, if not in our culture model of libidinal-love is a challenge and a major challenge: the challenge to love each other in turn. Being seduced is to challenge each other to be (there is no argument more subtle than that in which a woman is accused of being incapable of being seduced). Perversion, in this respect, has another meaning: pretend to be seduced, without being so and being unable to be.
The law of attraction is the first of an uninterrupted ritual exchange, a game where the games upward of who seduces and is seduced by those who are never defined, as is incomprehensible that the line should refer to the victory of ' one and the defeat of the other. And there is no limit to this challenge: the next challenge to be seduced or even more to love than is loved, the death penalty. In contrast, the sex has a proximate end and trivial: the enjoyment, the form of immediate fulfillment of desire. (...) The
trompe-l'oeil takes a real dimension to space in many of her seduction.
Pornography, on the contrary, adds a dimension to the space of sex, makes it more real than reality-thus depriving it of seduction
.(...) The hyper-realism is not surrealism, is a vision that leads to a fierce fighter against the seduction of a force visibility. There will "be more." (...) Repression absolute giving you a bit 'too , you amputate at all. All that is
nascostoe still enjoys interdict will be dug up, returned to the word and the evidence. The real increases, the real ramp, one day the universe will be real, and when will the real universal is death.
The secret and the challenge
Ilsegreto. Quality
seductress initiation, something that can not esseredetto because it makes no sense, something is not said and that also circulates. So I know the secret of the other but do not say, and he knows that I know, but do not lift the veil: the intensity between the two is nothing but the secret of the secret. A complicity that has nothing to do with that information withheld. Besides, even if both partners wish to reveal the secret, they could not do it because there's nothing to say ... Everything that can be detected on the side of passing secret: it is no hidden meaning, is not the key something; circulates and passes through everything that can be said, as the seduction runs under the obscenity of word is the opposite of communication, yet it shares. He holds his power only to the price of not being told, just as the seduction work only for the fact that I have never known and never wanted.
challenge and seduction are infinitely close. Yet perhaps there is a difference, namely the fact that the challenge is to bring more land beneficial to you, as it will be for him, in view of the game to unlimited upside, the strategy (?) Of seduction, however, is to bring the other on the ground of your defeat, which will also be his. Calculated defeat, defeat untold: the next challenge to lasciarvisi fall. Seducing (...) means making fragile. Seducing means faint. We seduce with our weakness, and never with strong signs or powers. The power of seduction lies in the fact that it put into play in our weakness. We seduce with our death, our vulnerability, with the void that is upon us. The secret is knowing how to "treat" this death in the absence of vision, in the absence of gesture, in the absence of knowledge, lack of a sense
.(...) There is something impersonal in every process of seduction, as in every crime, something ritual, and sovrasensuale-sovrasoggettivo his victim as the seducer-is only the reflection of the unconscious. Exercise a form of ritual, in which subjects wear. The set took charge at the same time, the aesthetic form of a work of art and ritual form of a crime.
+ Add to google 
0 comments:
Post a Comment